Characteristics and constraints of crossbred dairy cattle production in lowland areas of Eastern Ethiopia

Emebet Mureda and Zeleke Mekuriaw Zeleke*

Agricultural College, ATVET, Holleta, Ethiopia
*Bahir Dar University, PO Box 1866, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
Zeleke_Mekuriaw@yahoo.co.uk

Abstract

The study was conducted with the aim of assessing characteristics and constraints of crossbred dairy cattle (Holstein Friesian X Zebu) production in Dire-Dawa administrative region, eastern Ethiopia. The study covered 57 farms and 304 crossbred cows found in three dairy production systems, namely small scale (SS), Medium scale (MS) and large scale (LS) with 44, 115 and 169 cows.  Data on general farm management variables feed resources and herd health problems were collected by means of questionnaire and from individual cow records.

The main sources of feed for SS farms were concentrate, non-conventional feeds, hay and crop residues with the respective proportions of 97, 85, 79 and 66.7%. The proportion of farms from MS that used concentrate, hay, and crop residue were 95, 81 and 67%, respectively. The main sources of feed for LS farms were hay and concentrate. All farms from LS and 67% of farms from MS reported mastitis, calf scour and reproductive disorders as major herd health problems. In SS, only 24, 15 and 15% of farms reported the occurrence of the respective health problems. The principal postpartum reproductive health problems across all the systems were retention of placenta (19.4%), anoestrus (17.1%) and uterine infections (15.2%). There was no significant difference (p< 0.05) among production systems for these variables.

An appropriate feed resource and reproductive herd health management, a reliable AI service and an appropriate level of husbandry could be the management options to alleviate some of the prevailing problems.

Key words: crossbred dairy cattle; feed resources; production systems; health, management; reproduction

Introduction

Ethiopia is known for its huge livestock population; however, meat and milk production are very low. The country’s per capita milk consumption is estimated to be about 19.2kg per year, which is far below the average per capita consumption of Africa, 37.2kg per year (FAO 2000). Many countries have experienced very vast development in dairy sector in or around the largest urban centers, responding immediately to the market demand and profiting from the lack of links between the rural producer and the urban consumer. In Ethiopia too, urban and peri-urban dairy production systems are emerging as an important component of the milk production system. This system is contributing immensely towards filling in the large demand-supply gap for milk and milk products in urban centers, where consumption of milk and milk products is remarkably high (Azage and Alemu 1998). The urban and peri-urban dairy production system has tremendous potential for development and could play a significant role in minimizing the acute shortage of dairy products in urban centers of Ethiopia. However, except in towns situated in the central highland areas of Ethiopia including the capital city, very little work has been done to identify overall husbandry practices and constraints of dairy production systems in towns, especially situated in hot lowland areas. This study was, therefore, initiated to characterize husbandry practices and constraints of crossbred dairy production in urban and peri-urban areas of Dire-Dawa administrative region.

Materials and methods 

The study was conducted out in Dire Dawa administrative region (Figure 1) which is located in eastern part of Ethiopia between 9⁰27'E and 49'N latitude and between 41⁰38' N and 19'E longitude occupying about 133,000ha of land.

The area comprises of diversified topography features with altitude varying from 950 masl in the Northeast lowlands to 2,260 masl in the Southeast highlands (DDACADO 1998). The study area has a bimodal rainfall with the mean annual rainfall varying from 550 mm in the Northern lowlands to about 850 mm in the Southern mountains. The short rainy season is from April to May whereas the main rainy season is from July to September. The mean monthly maximum and minimum temperatures are 28.1 and 14.5⁰C (DDACAO 1998). Short-cycle annuals dominate the herbaceous layer, however, there are also perennials among which acacia is dominant and provides dry-season forage.

The farms considered for this study were categorised into defined strata based on dairy cattle herd size. These were small scale dairy production (SSDP), medium scale dairy production (MSDP) and large scale dairy production (LSDP) having 5 or less, 6 to 30 and 72 to 171 dairy cattle, respectively. The numbers of study farms, total herd size and herd structure in each production systems are summarized in Table 1.

Purposive sampling method was employed to select study farms that have got individual dairy cattle reproductive history or able to recall reproductive history of at least the last calving and willing to be part of the study. In all production systems, farms having crossbred cows and heifers were considered. A cross-sectional survey was carried out across the farms in Dire- Dawa Administrative region and then pre-designed structured questionnaires were developed, tested and administered to farm owners and attendants of all farms considered for the study. The questionnaire addresses livestock composition (herd size and herd structure), management (feed resources and feeding system, watering, husbandry and herd health problems) and reproduction (measure of reproductive performance, major dairy cattle reproductive problems and herd reproductive health management). Observational study on management, feeding, herd health and reproductive parameters and abnormalities were undertaken. Besides, individual animal records were included in the study from individual record sheets. Data on management forces (family labour versus employee), housing (floor and roof type, drainage and ventilation, presence of calving stall), general farm hygiene and recording systems and culling reason were collected. Similarly, feeding system, feed types, source of water and frequency of watering were recorded. Major dairy cattle health problems encountered and prophylactic measures undertaken were also recorded.

Descriptive statistics was used to illustrate the various variables in the production system including husbandry and management variables, inventory of feed types, feeding systems and herd health problems by using Statistical Analysis System Software (SAS 2002/3).

Results and discussion 

Husbandry and management

Herd size, herd structure and breeds of dairy cattle in the three farming systems are summarized in Table 2.

Farmers under SSDP, MSDP and LSDP systems possessed on average 3.24, 11.29 and 140.67 heads of crossbred cattle, respectively. In all the systems, farmers possessed dairy cows followed by heifers as their future herd replacement animals. The dominant dairy cattle breed across all the farm categories was a Friesian cross and only few farms from medium scale and large scales kept few Jersey crosses. Appreciable number of farms possessed other species of animals especially goats and poultry. Most of the smallholder dairy producers had no formal access to grazing land. Production was in a backyard utilizing whatever space was available in a compound.

Cattle sheds in SSDP were normally small structures made of corrugated metal sheet or mud and wattle and floored with blocks of stone or concrete. In MSDP system, most of the farms (57.14%) use traditional free stall with feeding trough. In both systems, all dairy cattle were managed together and calves kept in one corner of the same house or separately in another house. In all the systems, except one farm from LSDP, where they use both machine and hand milking, cows were hand-milked twice daily and only 28% of farms from SSDP allow suckling before and after milking.

None of the SSDP had breeding bulls mainly due to shortage of space and difficulties of management including shortage of feed. On the other hand, some of the MSDP and all of the LSDP had breeding bulls as an alternative to artificial insemination.

In LSDP systems, dairy cattle were kept in a modern barn but had no individual cattle pen (Table 3).

Lactating and dry cows were housed together.  Male and female calves and heifers were also housed together whereas breeding bulls were kept in separate place in the corners of the same barn. None of the producers in all the systems had separate calving pen. The general farm hygiene in 60.6 % and 66.7% of farms from SSDP and LSDP respectively was good. But most of the dairy farms from MSDP had fallen under satisfactory (52.4%) or poor (23.8). This was due to lack of sufficient space in the compound. These groups were neither well developed, having their own large farm size with grazing field, nor remained smaller with few manageable dairy herds.

A major problem in dairy herds regarding housing is the lack of sufficient space for age and physiological status groups of animals (Martin 1973). The need to group cows, based on their physiological status of production or reproduction was reported as mandatory, especially in large herds. Some of the most important reproductive problems were associated with the design of facilities and management of the environment (Radostitis et al 1994).

The management and labor forces in SSDP and MSDP systems were largely from family whereas in LSDP, the management and labor forces were professional or non-professional employees. 

Keeping of production and reproduction records was practiced in 54.6, 71.4 and 66.7% of farms from SSDP, MSDP and LSDP systems, respectively. In SSDP systems, farm owners, though did not have proper recording systems, keep artificial insemination (AI) recording card and receipts and closely follow up productive and reproductive efficiency of their cows.  Except one farm from LSDP, the recording system was not well developed. A number of farms, even if they have got the recording systems, kept only milk production records to follow up their financial aspects. They fail to realize the importance of reproductive efficiency for milk production. In general, the development and use of simple and understandable recording systems in all the production systems is of paramount importance.

Financial requirements, feed shortage and health problems were stated as the major reason for culling of dairy animals in SSDP and MSDP systems, whereas in LSDP the major reason stated was low milk production followed by health problems. In general, in all farms of every system, it is common to maintain unproductive animals, especially animals with poor reproductive performance. These could probably be due to lack of external source of replacement animals to maintain or expand herd size.

Breeding practices, methods used for heat detection and basic understanding of estrus are summarized in (Table 4).