| Livestock Research for Rural Development 18 (8) 2006 | Guidelines to authors | LRRD News | Citation of this paper |
A survey on livestock production was conducted through questionnaires among 76 rural farmers in the three wards of Enseleni district in Northen Kwazulu, Natal.
The study showed that the livestock owned comprised chickens, cattle, sheep and ducks. Cattle and goats were the main livestock used for cultural purposes. Livestock were sold for cash to get other household needs and contributed 20.2% to farmers' total income. Production was extensive, groundnuts were used as a traditional supplement to increase production and some medicinal plants were used to increase reproductive rates. Dosing, vaccination and injections were used to control health. No breeding season or system was reported. Farmers kept indigenous Nguni cattle, sheep, goats and chickens. Sickly and deformed animals were castrated or culled. Main constraints included lack of extension, theft and parasites.
Keywords: cattle, goats, traditional farming
Livestock and crop farming are the major source of food production and income in rural farming. Livestock are also kept as a source of investment, insurance against disaster and also for cultural purposes (Sibisi 1981). The South African government has, through extension programs, supported rural livestock farming by introducing modern farming practices. However, it seems more effort is required to improve livestock production for food security in these areas. The indigenous knowledge, socio-economic situation and attitudes of the rural farmers should be taken into consideration when planning strategies for rural livestock improvement. The purpose of this study was to investigate the traditional livestock farming methods practiced by rural farmers, the impact of livestock on the cash economy of the farmers, the nature of problems encountered and the solutions farmers preferred.
The investigation was undertaken in three wards (Somopho, Mhlana, Yanguye) in the Enseleni district, situated South of the Umfolozi Game Reserve, North of Empangeni, in northern Kwa-Zulu Natal. These areas are located at 280 30'S - 280 43' S, 310 33'E - 310 50' E, the altitude range is from 80 to 1900 m above sea level, with an annual rainfall that ranges from 600 mm in the drier valley to over 1 400 mm near the coast. All the farms in the three communities were visited. 76 farmers were available for questioning. Data were obtained by interviewing these farmers at their homesteads using structured questionnaires. Traditionally, the agricultural practices of the people in these wards consist of planting field crops, vegetables and raising livestock (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 1997). Observations of the daily management practices of the livestock and the grazing areas were also recorded. The community income data were analysed using Statistica (1999).
The collected data were grouped as follows:
Summary statistics were calculated to obtain a better understanding of the types of farms, farming methods and economical status of these rural communities.
The characteristics of the farmers are provided in Table 1.
|
Table 1. The background of the farmers at Enseleni district |
||
|
Farmer particulars |
Number of farmers |
Percentage |
Age |
|
|
|
Not sure |
1 |
1.30 |
|
20 - 30 |
1 |
1.30 |
|
31 - 40 |
14 |
18.4 |
|
41 - 50 |
29 |
38.2 |
|
51 -60 |
20 |
26.3 |
|
61-70 |
10 |
13.2 |
|
71-80 |
1 |
1.3 |
Head of household |
|
|
|
Male |
68 |
89.5 |
|
Female |
8 |
10.5 |
Academic qualifications |
|
|
|
None |
40 |
52.6 |
|
Lower primary |
9 |
11.8 |
|
Higher primary |
10 |
13.2 |
|
High school |
16 |
21.1 |
|
Tertiary |
1 |
1.30 |
|
Reported estimate of size of land in ha |
|
|
|
<1-1 |
1 |
1.3 |
|
2- 3 |
2 |
2.60 |
|
4 -5 |
10 |
13.2 |
|
6 -7 |
10 |
13.2 |
|
Did not know |
8 |
10.5 |
Source of income |
|
|
|
Pension |
9 |
11.8 |
|
Work |
23 |
30.3 |
|
Sales |
2 |
2.60 |
|
Pension and sales |
8 |
10.5 |
|
Sales and work |
28 |
36.8 |
|
Pension and work |
5 |
6.60 |
|
Pension, work and sales |
1 |
1.30 |
Most heads of households were male. Of women that headed households 75% were widowed and the rest had husbands that were migrant workers. There were few households headed by females in northern KwaZulu-Natal compared to the 60% households headed by widows or wives of migrant workers, reported by Bembridge (1984), for Transkei. A larger component of farmers (38%) were between the ages 41 and 50, 26% were between the ages 51 and 60 and 4 % were less than 30 years old, only one farmer was above 70 years old. More than half of the respondents (52.6%) did not go to school. Of the 47.4 % farmers, that had acquired some level of education, 21.1% had a high school qualification, 13.2% had higher primary education and 11.8% went as far as lower primary and only one farmer had a tertiary qualification. The level of the academic standard in this region was substantially lower than that of the Transkei, where 67.8% of the farmers had done some level in the lower primary and 4.3% had vocational qualifications (Bembridge 1984).
Land ownership in these areas was reported by the livestock extension officer to be under tribal authority (Mbatha, personal communication). The majority of the farmers estimated their land to be between four and five ha in size.
The main source of income was a combination of sales (agricultural produce and cold drinks) and work (Table 1). Types of work reported were temporal jobs of cutting timber trees for Mondi, working for Richards Bay Minerals and Alusaf (Aluminum Company at Richards Bay). A pension was the sole income of 11.8 % of the farmers.
The livestock types kept in the community were cattle, goats, sheep, chickens and ducks (Table 2).
|
Table 2. Livestock types owned by the farmers at Enseleni in rural Northern Kwazulu-Natal |
|||
|
|
Livestock |
Number of farmers |
Percentage of total farmers |
|
Cattle |
1 -10 |
23 |
30.3 |
|
|
11 -20 |
33 |
43.4 |
|
|
21 -30 |
5 |
6.60 |
|
|
31 -40 |
1 |
1.30 |
|
|
41 -50 |
1 |
1.30 |
|
|
51 -60 |
1 |
1.30 |
|
|
|
n = 64 |
|
|
Goats |
1 -10 |
18 |
23.7 |
|
|
11 -20 |
29 |
38.2 |
|
|
12 -30 |
3 |
4.00 |
|
|
31 -40 |
1 |
1.30 |
|
|
41 - 50 |
1 |
1.30 |
|
|
51 -60 |
1 |
1.30 |
|
|
|
n = 53 |
|
|
Sheep |
1 -5 |
2 |
2.60 |
|
|
6 -10 |
8 |
10.5 |
|
|
|
n = 10 |
|
|
Chickens |
1 - 20 |
25 |
32.9 |
|
|
21 -40 |
10 |
13.2 |
|
|
41 -60 |
2 |
2.60 |
|
|
61 -80 |
2 |
2.60 |
|
|
|
n =44 |
|
|
Ducks |
1 -14 |
1 |
1.30 |
|
|
|
n =14 |
|
The majority of the cattle owners had between 11 and 20 heads, similarly the common range in goat ownership was between 11 and 20. Most chicken owners had between 1 and 20 chickens. The results presented in Table 3 reflected that chickens were the most popular of the livestock in the community, followed by cattle and goats; however, the sheep were only 2 % of the total livestock.
|
Table 3. Proportions of livestock types and combinations owned by farmers at Enseleni in rural Northern-Kwazulu-Natal |
||||
|
Livestock type |
Livestock |
Percentage of total livestock |
Combinations of livestock |
Percentage of total farmers |
|
Cattle |
871 |
31.4 |
Cattle,goats,chickens |
34.2 |
|
Goats |
810 |
29.2 |
Cattle,goats |
22.4 |
|
Sheep |
51 |
2 |
Cattle,goats,sheep |
4 |
|
Chickens |
1025 |
36.9 |
Cattle,sheep |
9.20 |
|
Ducks |
14 |
0.5 |
Cattle, chickens |
11.8 |
|
|
|
|
Cattle |
2.60 |
|
|
|
|
Goats, chickens |
1.30 |
|
|
|
|
Goats, chickens, ducks |
1.30 |
|
|
|
|
Goats |
4.00 |
|
Total |
2771 |
100 |
|
100 |
All the farmers were livestock owners. The composition of livestock types owned by farmers varied, the most common was that of cattle, goats and chickens owned by 34.2% of the farmers followed by that of cattle and goats owned by 22.4% of the farmers (Table 3). The combination of livestock owned in these rural farms was similar to other investigations conducted in other rural areas of southern Africa; Swaziland (Sibisi 1979) and Transkei (Bembridge 1984).
The data gathered about the utilisation of livestock in 1998 and 1999 is provided in (Table 4).
|
Table 4. Some functions of livestock in traditional farming of Northern Kwazulu-Natal |
|||||||
|
Species |
Number slaughtered only for home consumption |
Number slaughtered and consumed for cultural ceremonies |
Number used to pay lobola (bride price) |
Number used to pay penalty |
Number of livestock sold |
Total livestock used |
Percentage of total farmers who used or sold the livestock type |
|
Cattle |
9 |
101 |
40 |
12 |
97 |
259 |
31.6 |
|
Sheep |
20 |
- |
- |
2 |
2 |
24 |
1.30 |
|
Goats |
10 |
119 |
9 |
4 |
97 |
239 |
22.4 |
|
Chickens |
695 |
- |
- |
- |
98 |
793 |
7.90 |
|
Ducks |
15 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
15 |
|
|
Totals |
749 |
220 |
49 |
18 |
294 |
1330 |
63.2 |
|
Livestock used, % |
56.3 |
16.5 |
3.7 |
1.4 |
22.1 |
100 |
|
Cattle and goats were reported to be used for similar functions (consumption, sale and cultural use); the sheep were not reported to be used for any cultural purpose. More cattle (101) and goats (119) were slaughtered and consumed during cultural ceremonies than for paying dues. The rural farmers in Transkei and in Swaziland were also reported to use cattle and goats for similar purposes (Sibisi 1979; Bembridge 1984). The chickens were more regularly slaughtered than the other livestock. These results support those of Ogle (1990) that versatile use of chickens to provide meat and eggs for households could be an attractive option. Though most of the animals were used for home consumption, a considerable number were sold (22.1%). Goats and cattle seemed to have been sold equally.
Figure 1 shows the income distribution for the years 1998 and 1999.
|
|
|
Figure 1. Income distribution for the farmers |
Of the total households that sold livestock, 76.3% earned less than R3999 and 3.9% earned over R16000. The majority (96.1%) of the farmers that sold crops, vegetables or cold drinks (other sales) got less or up to R3999. Fixed amounts were those obtained from work and pension, and 39.5% earned over R16000. The grand totals reflect that most of the income earners (47.4%) got over R16000 and the least (6.6%) got between R12000 and R15999.
Figure 2 shows that the largest contributor to the income of the homesteads was obtained through employment (55.9 %); however, the income from livestock showed a substantial contribution (20.2%) of the total income.
|
|
|
|
These results support those of Moorosi (1999) who reported that livestock are major sources of income for South African small-scale farmers. It was reported by 79% of the farmers, that livestock were sold when there was a need for cash like school fees (Figure 3). A few farmers sold cattle when numbers were over 25 to avoid losses from lack of grazing land and because of occasional drought spells.
|
|
|
|
All the farmers reported an extensive rearing system. The livestock were reported to graze on communal grazing areas during the daytime and were brought back into kraals, which are within the homesteads at night. Similarly, all chicken farmers reported a free-range system.
The data collected from this investigation indicated that the farmers used various traditional supplements to enhance reproductive and productive performances. Medicinal plants such as Sarcostemma viminale (igotsha), Crinum macowanii (umduze), Rhoicissus tredentata (isinwazi) and Tetradenia riparia (ibozane) were reported to be given to livestock anytime during the year to increase the milk production by stimulating the letdown process. Potassium permanganate dissolved in the drinking water was used to increase reproductive rate by increasing fertility and twinning. Ground peanuts and Crinum macowanni were given to cattle at anytime during the year to improve the reproductive rate (Table 5).
|
Table 5. Some
traditional supplements and veterinary use of plants reported by rural
farmers at |
||
|
Plant/supplement used |
Use |
Total farmers |
|
Sarcostemma viminale (igotsha) |
Increase the milk production |
13.2 |
|
Crinum macowani (umduze) |
Increase the milk production |
13.2 |
|
Rhoicissus tredentata (isinwazi) |
Improve rate of reproduction |
2.60 |
|
Tetradenia riparia (ibozane) |
Increase milk production |
2.60 |
|
Potassium permanganate |
Increase reproductive rate |
15.8 |
|
Ground peanuts |
Improve reproductive rate |
6.60 |
Table 6 presents various methods of disease control thst were used.
|
Table 6. Herd health control practiced by farmers at Enseleni in Northern-Kwazulu-Natal |
||
|
Health Practice |
Number of farmers |
Livestock type owners, % |
|
Communal dipping of cattle |
59 |
92.9 |
|
Cattle spray dip |
5 |
7.80 |
|
Communal dip of sheep and goats |
0 |
0 |
|
Spray dip of sheep and goats |
0 |
0 |
|
Tail docking |
3 |
30.0 |
|
Dosing, vaccination and injections of any livestock type when necessary |
65 |
85.5 |
Most of the cattle were taken to a communal dip facility for control of ticks. None of the farmers were reported to dip sheep and goats. Dosing, vaccination and injections were reported by 85.5% of all the farmers to be main methods of improving health condition of livestock. Tail docking of sheep was done by 30% of sheep owners to prevent attacks by parasites as well as to improve growth rate and meat production.
There were three types of cattle breeds owned in these areas (Table 7). Most of the cattle farmers kept the Nguni breed because they are well adapted to the local environment and were resistant to many diseases. Other farmers owned Brahman for increased meat production due to its large body size. Only a few farmers kept the Jersey breed for higher milk yields and tolerance of the local environment. The small stock owners kept indigenous sheep and/or goats. The farmers reported that they preferred the indigenous breeds to exotics because they were better adapted to the local hot climate, had reasonable meat production and were resistant to various diseases .
|
Table 7. Breeds owned and those preferred by the farmers in some rural areas of Northern- KwaZulu-Natal |
||||
|
Breed owned |
Number of farmers |
Livestock |
Advantages mentioned by the breed type owner |
Breed type owner mentioning |
|
Brahman and Nguni |
14 |
21.9 |
Adapt well to local climate |
78.1 |
|
Jersey |
1 |
1.6 |
High milk yield and tolerate local conditions |
1.60 |
|
Nguni cattle |
49 |
76.6 |
Adapt to local conditions and have good disease resistance |
76.6 |
|
Nguni (Zulu) sheep |
10 |
100 |
Adapt well to hot climate, resistant to diseases |
90.0 |
|
|
|
Good meat quality |
10 |
|
|
Nguni (Zulu) goats |
53 |
100 |
Adapt well to hot climate, have resistance to diseases |
94.0 |
|
Zulu chickens |
53 |
100 |
Can survive (by scavenging) even when maize is not available |
68.2 |
|
|
|
Do not need high inputs |
22.7 |
|
|
|
||||