| Livestock Research for Rural Development 18 (6) 2006 | Guidelines to authors | LRRD News | Citation of this paper |
This study was carried out within a project for production of purebred and crossbred parental stocks of rabbits to be distributed to small-scale breeders in Qalyoubia Governorate, Egypt for five consecutive production years started in September 1995. This project involving Egyptian Gabali and New Zealand White (NZW) rabbits. Data of 1089 litter traits (litter size at birth, LSB, and at weaning, LSW, and litter weight at birth, LWB, and at weaning, LWW) produced from 8 genetic groups (2 purebreds and 6 crossbreds) were used. Data were analyzed using crossbreeding effect program to estimate crossbreeding components (additive, heterosis and recombination effects of direct individual, maternal and paternal components) and repeatability multi-trait animal model to estimate genetic parameters (additive variance, permanent environmental variance, heritability and repeatability).
Results showed that differences between NZW and Gabali breeds were non-significant for all the studied litter traits, in spite of favorable of Gabali for all litter traits except LWB. The differences among some crossbred groups and purebreds were significant (P<0.05) for LSW and LWW. Direct additive genetic effects of individual, maternal and paternal were negative and significant (P<0.05 or P<0.01) and they reduced the general mean of LSB by 1.8, 1.5% and 1.4%, respectively. Estimates of dominance (direct heterosis) effect were of moderate importance on LSB as these were negative (decreased the general mean by 4.03%) and significant (P<0.05). While positive insignificant maternal and paternal heterotic effects on LSB trait were obtained. Estimates of recombination effects of direct individual, maternal and paternal were negative for all traits and significant (P<0.01) only for LSB and LSW traits. It is concluded that crossbred of NGxNG was the highest mean of LSW, followed by G-GNxG-GN crossbred. While, the crossbred of G-GNxG-GN was the highest mean of LWW. Percentages of additive genetic variance were somewhat low or moderate and were 4.19%, 0.85%, 7.58% and 8.96% for LSB, LWB, LSW, and LWW, respectively. Proportions of permanent environmental variance for doe performance of litter traits were low or somewhat moderate and were 2.36%, 8.88%, 4.31%, and 18.65% for LSB, LWB, LSW, and LWW, respectively. Heritability estimates were (generally low) 0.04, 0.01, 0.08, and 0.09 for LSB, LWB, LSW and LWW, respectively. Repeatability estimates for LSB and LWW were moderate (0.278 and 0.276, respectively), but low estimates of 0.097 and 0.076, respectively for LSW and LWB.
Generally, it is concluded that hybrid vigor with respect to maternal and paternal additive effects was positive which explains the influence of maternal and paternal effects at earlier ages.
Key words: direct additive, heritability, heterosis and recombination effects of direct individual, maternal and paternal, litter traits in rabbits, repeatability
Crossbreeding has been established to exploit the heterosis in animal breeding and it could be successfully employed in rabbit breeding for increased productivity. Gabali rabbits raised under the Egyptian desert conditions, introduced from Sinai desert, are characterized by large litter size of 8-12 young and heavy body weight of 3.5-4.5 kg (Galal and Khalil 1994). New Zealand White (NZW) breed was found to exhibit out-standing maternal abilities related to maternal behavior, fecundity, fertility, lactation and pre-weaning growth and survival (Ozimba and Lukefahr 1991). Crossbreeding program of NZW rabbit with local Gabali breed may be suitable to increase rabbit meat production. Paternal and maternal additive direct effects, maternal and paternal heterosis from crossbreeding experiments including Gabali and NZW rabbits were expected to be important especially for litter traits (Khalil 1996). Results of most crossbreeding experiments carried out in Egypt reported that crossing does of NZW breed with bucks of local breeds were generally associated with heterotic effects on most litter and growth traits (Afifi et al 1994 and Khalil et al 1995). The diversity in crossbred genetic groups that exists between standard NZW breed and the local Gabali breed is likely to provide genetic combinations that suit a variety of environment and production systems in Egypt. Pure breeding and crossbreeding experiments have been carried out to improve reproductive traits of local Egyptian breeds, under the local Egyptian conditions. But more trials in Egypt are needed to produce crossbred does that have superiority in litter traits.
Nowadays, the multi-trait animal model is widely used for evaluation of rabbit breeding programs and facilitates obtaining good estimates of variance components (Baselga et al 1992; Iraqi 2003). The inclusion of common or permanent environmental effects allows to obtain true estimates of additive genetic variance (Iraqi 2003). But, most of the reviewed studies have neglected the effect of permanent environment effects in the model of analysis for these traits in rabbits. This effect may be more important than direct additive genetic effects (Ferraz and Eler 1996).
This research was conducted to: (1) compare the performance of pure breeds of Gabali and NZW rabbits and their different crossbred groups for litter traits (litter size at birth, LSB, and at weaning, LSW, and weight at birth, LWB, and at weaning, LWW); (2) estimate of crossbreeding effects, i.e. direct additive, heterotic and recombination effects in direct individual, maternal and paternal components using Dickerson models (Dickerson 1969 and 1973); and (3) estimate genetic aspects (e.g. direct additive genetic and permanent environmental variances, heritability and repeatability (using multi-trait animal model).
The data used in the present study were from a project for production of purebred and crossbred parental stocks of rabbits to be distributed to small-scale breeders in Qalyoubia Governorate. This project involved Egyptian Gabali (were brought from the rabbitry of Maryout Experimental Station) and New Zealand White (were descendants of NZW rabbits belonging to Bank El-Nil rabbitry) rabbits. Mating of rabbits was started in September 1995 in the experimental rabbitry, Faculty of Agriculture at Moshtohor, Zagazig University, Banha Branch, Egypt. The experimental work of this study was conducted for five consecutive production years from 1995 to 1999.
Breeding stock (bucks and does) was individually housed in wire cages with standard dimension arranged in one-tire batteries. Cages of does were provided with metal nest boxes. At sexual maturity (at 6 month), each doe was transferred to the buck's cage to be bred. Each doe was palpated 10 days thereafter to detect pregnancy. Does that failed to conceive were returned to the same mating buck to be rebred, and were returned to the same buck every other day thereafter until a service was observed. On the 25th day after the fruitful conception, the nest boxes were supplied with rice straw to provide a comfortable warm nest for members of the litters. Litters were weaned at 28 day post-kindling. At weaning, litters were weighed and separated from their dams. A commercial pelleted ration (contained 16.3% crude protein, 13.2% crude fiber, 2.5% fat ) was provided in the morning and in the afternoon. The ingredients of this ration were 33% barely, 21% wheat bran, 10% Soya bean meal (44% C.P.), 22% hay, 6% berseem straw, 3% corticated cotton seed meal, 3.3% molasses, 1% lime stone, 0.34% salt, 0.3% minerals and vitamins and 0.06% methionine. In winter and early months of spring, berseem (Trifolium alexandrinum) was supplied for does at midday. Fresh clean water was available at all time. Cages of bucks were cleaned and disinfected regularly while that of does and nest boxes at each kindling. All breed groups of rabbits were subjected to the same environmental, medication and managerial conditions.
Doe traits of litter size at birth (LSB), litter weight at birth (LWB), litter size at weaning (LSW) and litter weight at weaning (LWW) were recorded. Data structure of mating groups and numbers of does, sire of doe, dam of doe and litters used from different genetic groups in this study are illustrated in Table 1.
|
Table 1. Structure of mating groups and numbers of doe, sire of doe, dam of doe and litters used for litter traits of rabbits in the present study. |
||||||||
|
No. of genetic group |
Breed of sire of the doe |
Breed of dam of the doe |
Breed of doe |
No. of does |
No. of sires of the doe |
No. of buck used |
No. of dam of the doe |
No. of litters produced |
|
1 |
N |
N |
N |
292 |
96 |
78 |
138 |
738 |
|
2 |
G |
G |
G |
22 |
9 |
8 |
14 |
44 |
|
3 |
½ G ½ N |
½ G ½ N |
½ G ½ N |
48 |
23 |
14 |
35 |
125 |
|
4 |
½ N ½ G |
½ N ½ G |
½ N ½ G |
7 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
14 |
|
5 |
¼ G ¾ N |
¼ G ¾ N |
¼ G ¾ N |
19 |
13 |
4 |
17 |
57 |
|
6 |
¾ N ¼ G |
¾ N ¼ G |
¾ N ¼ G |
22 |
12 |
5 |
19 |
62 |
|
7 |
(½G½N)2 |
(½G½N)2 |
(½G½N)2 |
14 |
7 |
3 |
12 |
41 |
|
8 |
¾ G ¼ N |
¾ G ¼ N |
¾ G ¼ N |
3 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
|
Total |
427 |
163 |
115 |
242 |
1089 |
|||
Data of 1089 litters produced from 427 does fathered by 163 and mothered by 242 were analyzed using repeatability multi-trait animal model (RMTAM) based on the following model (Boldman et al 1995):
(Model
1)
Where:
y = vector of observation of the
doe,
= vector of fixed effects of breed group (8
levels) and year-season combination (13 levels),
ua = vector of random direct additive genetic
effect of the doe for the ith trait,
up = vector of random permanent environmental
effect (doe x parity combination),
X,
Za and
Zp are
incidence matrices relating records of the ith trait to
the fixed effects (breed group and year-season), random doe effects
and random permanent environmental effect, respectively, and
e= vector of random error.
The crossbreeding components for the studied traits were estimated using three sub-models of the Dickerson-Model (Dickerson 1969 and 1973).
Software of crossbreeding effect, CBE (Wolf 1996) was used to analyze the crossbreeding data. Coefficients of expected contribution for genetic effects in the eight genetic groups of purebreds and crossbreds rabbits are illustrated in Table 2 as computed by program of CBE (Wolf 1996) based on Dickerson (1969, 1973).
|
Table 2. Coefficients of expected contribution for genetic effects in different genetic component groups of purebreds and crossbreds as computed by Dickerson (1969, 1973) model for litter traits in rabbits. |
||||||||||||
|
No of breed group |
Sire |
Dam |
Breed group |
Individual effects |
Maternal effects |
Paternal effects |
||||||
|
ai (gi) |
di
|
aai |
a m (gm) |
dm |
aam |
ap |
dp |
aap |
||||
|
1 |
N |
N |
N |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
2 |
G |
G |
G |
-1 |
0 |
0 |
-1 |
0 |
0 |
-1 |
0 |
0 |
|
3 |
½ G ½ N |
½G ½ N |
½ G ½ N |
0 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
4 |
½ N ½ G |
½ N ½ G |
½ N ½ G |
0 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
5 |
¼ G ¾ N |
¼ G ¾ N |
¼ G ¾ N |
0.5 |
0.375 |
0.375 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.25 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.25 |
|
6 |
¾ N ¼ G |
¾ N ¼ G |
¾ N ¼ G |
0.5 |
0.375 |
0.375 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.25 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.25 |
|
7 |
(½G½N)2 |
(½G½N)2 |
(½G½N)2 |
0 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
|
8 |
¾ G ¼ N |
¾ G ¼ N |
¾ G ¼ N |
-0.5 |
0.375 |
0.375 |
-0.5 |
0.5 |
0.25 |
-0.5 |
0.5 |
|
The general form of the Dickerson-model (1969, 1973) not including maternal effects can be written as (Wolf 1996):
(Model
2)
Where:
mD
=
general mean;
g = direct genetic effects (breed difference),
h = effect of heterosis,
r = recombination effect,
=
proportion of genes in G from the ith source population
(i=1, 2), and
=
probability that at a randomly chosen locus of a randomly chosen
individual of G one allele is from the ith source
population and other allele is from the jth source
population (i, j = 1, 2 and i< j).

Three sub-models were used to estimate genetic
components, respectively, Sub-model 1: model with direct additive,
dominance and epistatic effects; Sub-model 2: model with maternal
additive, dominance and epistatic effects; Sub-model 3: model with
paternal additive, dominance and epistatic effects. All analyses
were carried out without considering any reference population. The
method of weighted least squares was used for parameter estimation.
The goodness of fit of the individual models was tested by the
-test.
Direct heritability (
) were computed as:
=
/ (
+
+
)
Where:
=
direct additive genetic variance,
=
permanent environmental variance,
and
= error variance.
Repeatability was expressed as the ratio of variances
by summing of additive genetic and permanent environmental
variances (
+
) to
total phenotypic variance (
+
+
).
Actual means given in Table 3 indicated the differences between NZW and Gabali breeds were non-significant for LSB, LSW, LWB and LWW, in spite of favorable result of Gabali for all litter trait except LWB.
|
Table 3. Actual means and their standard errors (SE) for litter traits in genetic groups of rabbits. |
||||||
|
Genetic group+ |
No. |
% |
LSB++ |
LWB++ |
LSW++ |
LWW++ |
|
Mean±SE |
Mean±SE |
Mean±SE |
Mean±SE |
|||
|
Purebred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NxN |
738 |
67.8 |
6.6±0.07a |
429.4± 4.7a |
4.8±0.07ab |
2968.1± 44.8ab |
|
GxG |
44 |
4.0 |
6.8±0.30a |
422.7±19.3a |
5.2±0.30ab |
3133.1±183.3ab |
|
Average: |
|
|
6.5 |
423.8 |
5.4 |
3050.6 |
|
Crossbred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GNxGN |
125 |
11.5 |
6.8±0.18a |
423.8±11.4a |
5.4±0.18ab |
2965.6±108.8ab |
|
NGxNG |
14 |
1.3 |
6.9±0.53a |
417.9±34.2a |
5.9±0.54a |
3267.5±325.0ab |
|
GN-NxGN-N |
57 |
5.2 |
6.1±0.26a |
374.8±16.9a |
4.6±0.27b |
2614.3±161.1b |
|
NG-NxNG-N |
62 |
5.7 |
6.7±0.25a |
405.9±16.2a |
5.5±0.25ab |
3095.1±154.4ab |
|
(GN-GN)2x(GN-GN)2 |
41 |
3.8 |
6.3±0.31a |
401.2±20.0a |
4.8±0.31ab |
2711.7±189.9ab |
|
G-GNxG-GN |
8 |
0.7 |
6.6±0.70a |
438.8±45.2a |
5.8±0.71ab |
3381.3±430.0a |
|
Average: |
|
|
6.7 |
414.3 |
5.8 |
3005.9 |
|
+N= New
Zealand White breed and G = Gabali breed; ++LSB, LWB,
LSW and LWW= litter size at birth, litter weight at birth, litter size
at weaning and litter weight at weaning, respectively. |
||||||
These means are within ranges of the available literature for the same traits of NZW (raised in Egypt) and Gabali local Egyptian breed. The differences among means of LSB and LWB in different genetic crossbred groups were also non-significant. Meanwhile, the differences among some crossbred groups and purebreds were significant (p<0.05) for LSW and LWW. Crossbred of NGxNG was the highest mean of LSW, followed by G-GNxG-GN crossbred. Moreover, the crossbred of G-GNxG-GN was the highest mean of LWW, followed by NGxNG group (Table 3). On the other hand, average of all crossbred groups was somewhat high for LSB and LSW comparing with average of purebreds. One could be conclude that crossing between NZW and Gabali increased the litter size traits in rabbits (Khalil 1996).
Table 4 showed that additive genetic effects of direct, maternal and paternal were negative and significant (P<0.05 or P<0.01) and they reduced the general mean of LSB by 1.8, 1.5% and 1.4%, respectively. The negative values for this trait may be due to somewhat higher mean in the local Gabali rabbit breed than in the foreign NZW breed. This is confirmed by the results of the present experiment, as the average LSB of Gabali rabbits was 6.8 slightly higher than NZW rabbits as it was 6.6. This result is in agreement with (Abd El-Aziz 1998; Nayera et al 1999; Abd El-Aziz et al 2002) who reported results in favour of Gabali rabbits.
|
Table 4. Estimates of crossbreeding effects using Dickerson sub-models for litter size at birth and at weaning in rabbits. |
|||
|
Effect+ |
Sub-models of Dickerson (1969, 1973)++ |
||
|
Model (1) |
|||