Description, socio-economic characteristics, disease managements and mortality dynamics in smallholder's dairy production system in coastal humid region of Tanga, Tanzania

E S Swai, E D Karimuribo*, L Schoonman**, N P French***, J Fitzpatrick**** D Kambarage* and M J Bryant*****

Veterinary Investigation Centre, P O Box 1068, Arusha, Tanzania
emasw@yahoo.co.uk
*Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P O Box 3019, Morogoro Tanzania
**Tanga Dairy Development Trust, P O Box 1474, Tanga, Tanzania
***Department of Veterinary Clinical Science and Animal Husbandry University of Liverpool, UK
****The Moredun Research Institute, UK
*****Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, UK

Abstract

This retrospective cross-sectional study aimed to provide descriptive information on socio-economics, disease management practices and mortality dynamics in an intensive dairying area of coastal humid region of Tanzania. In this study, an interview response rate of 100% was recorded.

The farm demographic information revealed farm size to be 8.0 hectares (ha) for rural (R), 4.2 ha for peri-urban (P) and 2.7 ha for urban (U) with a median of 3-4 dairy cattle per farm. Eighty seven percent of the farmers were males and dairying was ranked third as a major source of household income. The study identifies and listed difficult milk marketing, feeds and diseases as the most challenging farm constraints. The use of permanent labour was revealed to be common feature in all farm classes (rural, peri-urban and urban) and the tendency of using family labour was noted more in rural than urban and peri-urban located smallholder farms.

The study revealed that most farms were using acaricides that require on-farm dilution, and that most farms were under-dosing with acaricides and using acaricide at irregular or inconsistent intervals. Most farms seem to be aware of udder disease (mastitis) as reflected by high pre- milking udder preparation responses, but milking techniques and post- milking udder management were inadequately carried out.

During the study, 894 animals that were alive at some stage in 1998 were followed for a total of 648 animal years and the overall mortality rate was 8.5 animals per 100 year-risk. Of the total deaths, 56% were animals less than one year old and 40% of these were attributed to tick born diseases (TBDs - theileriosis and anaplasmosis). Animal less than 12 months of age and male stock had higher death rates than older animals and females.

The results of the study therefore show that for a smallholder dairy enterprise to be adopted on a wide scale, and for it to be sustainable, there is a need for the effective implementation of policies on disease control, proper farm planning and milk marketing, adequate input supply to the farmers as well as strengthening the extension service to enhance the production of dairying in the Tanga region of Tanzania.

Key words: Dairy cattle, demographic profiles, mortality, smallholders, TBDs, Tanga, Tanzania

Introduction

A major challenge facing several nations of the world today, including Tanzania is the need to feed the ever increasing populations (Winrock International 1992; Kurwijila 1994). This fast growing human population coupled with malnutrition and the low income of the people strongly suggests the need for further establishment, expansion and promotion of dairy farming in Tanzania. As a result, the per capita milk consumption has remained 22 litres less than the African average for the last two decade (Kurwijila 1994; Sansoucy 1995). In order to increase the milk supply to major urban centres, market-oriented intra-urban, peri-urban and rural dairy production systems have recently emerged.

Smallholder dairying gained momentum during the early 1980's, immediately after agriculture and livestock policy reform (Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development 1984) whereby strong emphasis was directed to smallholder producers (rural, peri-urban and urban) in favour of the then under performing large-scale farms. Under mixed, peri-urban dairy production systems, animals are normally semi- or zero-grazed and depend on farm-established or collected roadside pastures, crop residues and locally-obtained compounded concentrates. Marginal capital investment (Leslie et al 1999) and involvement of the farmer in other farm enterprises are common features (Msanga 1997). Due to small capital investment and less attention of farmers on key management issues such as nutrition and disease preventive measures, return on investment in relation to other alternate farm activities has been low (Leslie et al 1999). Low milk yields, poor growth rate for young stock, high morbidity and animal losses through mortalities (Msanga 1997; Tanga Dairy Development Programme (TDDP) 1994) have further compromised the overall farm output in these systems.

The recent rapid appraisal study in Tanga and Iringa regions of Tanzania, revealed that over 70% of the formal marketed milk in Tanzania came from smallholder dairy farms (Leslie et al 1999). However, most of the increased production in the smallholder sector has been due to increased use of land and livestock resources rather than from higher individual-cow productivity (Walshe et al 1991). In Tanzania, approximately 80% of the smallholder dairy cattle are stall-fed for the greater part of the year (ILCA 1979). Such intensification will require improved management and increased resources per cow. An important step in evaluating potential development alternatives is to identify the major constraints and opportunities for increased productivity on smallholder dairy farms. To this end, a structured cross-sectional study of randomly selected smallholder dairy farms in the coastal humid region of Tanzania was initiated. The objective of the study was to identify and quantify potential production constraints. In this paper we describe smallholder dairy unit profiles and quantify mortality events in a typical Tanzanian smallholder dairy setting.

Materials and Methods

Study area/location

This cross-sectional field study was conducted in Tanga Region, located between Latitude 4^o 21' and 6^o 14' S, and Longitude 36^o 11' and 38^o 26' E, in northeast Tanzania. The study area comprises the humid coastal, hinterland and highland zones of the region at an altitude of between 200 and 2000 metres (m) above sea level. Characteristics of the region are described in detail by Swai (1999) but briefly the study sites comprise five administrative districts (Tanga, Muheza, Pangani, Lushoto and Korogwe), with the land classified into five 'agro-ecological zone' (AEZ) basing on elevation, soil types, rainfall (amount and pattern), water retention ability and crops grown (National Coconut Development Council (NCDC) 1981). The location of each farm in each administrative district was also classified as rural, urban or peri-urban. Urban farms were those occurring within towns, peri-urban farms were those peripheral to towns but within a 15 kilometres (km) of the town centre and rural farms were those occurring at 15 or more km from a town centre. Such location of farm by administrative district could influence farm productivity (i.e. availability of supplement feeds, breeding service), due to ease of access to suppliers. Farm locations (by administrative district and farm class) were considered as explanatory (independent) variables during data analysis.

Climate and topography

The climate of the region is tropical heterogeneous with a bimodal rainfall pattern (the short rains falling from September to November and the long rains from March to May). The mean annual rainfall varies from 500 to 1400 mm/year depending on altitude. The topography of the area ranges from coastal plain to inland upland slopes. Soils are sandy in the coastal belt, clay to loamy in the hinterland, and leached mineral laterite in the highlands. The relative humidity of the day ranges from 70% on the coast to 40-50% in the highlands for most of the year. Temperatures range typically from a low of 15^oC in June to August and a high of 35 ^oC in December to March. Most areas within the region receive between 2300 to 3100 hours of sunshine a year.

Study farms and husbandry practices

Farms for the study were identified from the TDDP database. Two hundred farms from a sampling frame of 3001 small holders, distributed in five out of the six districts found in Tanga Region, were randomly selected for the study that began in October 1998. Dairy stock kept included crosses of Bos taurus (Friesian, Ayrshire, Jersey, Simmental) and Bos indicus (Tanzania Shorthorn Zebu, Boran, Sahiwal) at levels of Bos taurus genes that varies typically from 50 to 85%.

Data collection

A pre-tested, structured questionnaire (PSQ) administered on each farm at each visit was used to collect information on animal and farm level management practices. Data collected by the questionnaire included details of the type of animal housing (cowshed with and without roof, Kraal), whether or not animals had access to minerals, whether the animal had grazed or been zero grazed, whether the cattle owner had attended any dairy husbandry training, contact rate with extension agent, herd size, feeding regime, breeding regime, age of the animal, breed, filial generation (classified as F1, F2 and F3 basing on the level of Bos taurus genes and breeding records), source of animals (home-bred or brought-in) and tick control practices. All the information collected related to farm (land size, labour profile) and animal events occurring in, or relevant to 1998. This involved detailed tracing of all animals on the farm, and examination of any written records, so that all ages of the cattle, calving dates, date of deaths and other movements of cattle on and off the farms agreed chronologically. The study was conducted during the period of January-April 1999.

Data analysis

Descriptive statistics for the animal and farm level explanatory variables examined in the study were developed using Epi-Info version 6.04d (1996), Centre for Disease Control, Atlanta, USA. The proportions of categorical variables were screened for significant association between outcome variable and explanatory variables using a 2x2 contingency table. The level of significance was set at 0.05. Graphical results were developed using the Excel soft ware program (Microsoft Inc., USA)

Mortality rate estimates

Mortality rate was estimated using the following formula :(Martin et al 1987):

Animal days at risk are the total number of days the study animals were present during the year under study. An animal's number of days present during the study was calculated as the difference between its date of exit (or end of December 1998) and its date of entry (or start of 1998). For mortality estimates, the farm was the primary sampling unit. The study population was all dairy stock that was alive at any time during 1998. Using Cox proportional -hazard (Cox 1972) modelling (with farm as a random effect), the relationship between mortality and animal level variables of age and sex were estimated using S-plus 2000 (Math Soft Inc. 2000).

Results and discussion

Smallholder unit profiles

All 200 surveyed farms (comprising 698 animals) that represented 6.6% of all farms in the sampling frame were visited and interviewed. (a 100% voluntary response rate).

The average mean land size was 8.0 ha for rural, 4.2 ha for peri-urban and 5.0 ha for urban, with a range of 0 - 38 ha. The reserved land for dairy enterprises ranged from 0 to 6 ha and mean values for the farm classes were 1.2 ha for rural, 0.6 ha for peri-urban and 0.4 ha for urban (Table 1). The average number of dairy cattle per farm was between 3 and 4. A similar number of dairy animals was reported in smallholder dairy production in Kiambu district of Kenya (Gitau et al 1994a). Many farms had access to water (tap, pond or borehole) at a mean radius of 243 m for rural, 122 m for peri-urban and 33 m for urban farming communities.

Farm constraints

Generally milk marketing, feed availability and diseases were ranked as the most important farm constraints in all farm classes (Table 2).  Feed availability was ranked first and was significantly (P< 0.001) higher in peri-urban than in rural and urban areas. This observation was in agreement with the findings of Msangi (1998), Leslie et al (1999) and Rutamu (1999), who reported animal feeds as a major farm constraint for zero grazed dairy cattle.

Position of dairying and the source of household income

During individual interviews , farmers were asked which enterprise was the most important source of household income (Figure 1). Rural located farmers ranked crop farming (24%) first, closely followed by dairying (12%). Off-farm employment (19%) and trading (5%) were ranked first in urban located farms. Overall, dairying was ranked third as the most important source of household income in the study area. Many studies (Van Munster 1997; Leslie et al 1999) complemented dairying for its immense contribution as a source of income for rural areas. Regular flow of cash, milk for household consumption and for collateral or security being the most cited reasons (Swai et al 1992).

Labour profile in smallholder unit

Overall, the study survey identified four major forms of labour engagement, arranged in the order of importance: Permanent labour (47%), Family labour (26%), seasonal labour (23.5%) and casual (3.5 %). Proportionally, high use of family labour was noted as one move toward peri-urban and rural located farms (P = 0.002). Because of off-farm activities (in many urban/peri urban farms), the tendency was to recruit more permanent labour. Seasonal labour was a common feature in most of the rural located households (Figure 2). Dairy farming by its nature is a labour demanding activity that greatly influences industry performance.

Distributions of farm management variables

Details of the farm management factors investigated are summarised in Table 3.

Dairy farming experience ranged from more than 5 years for 38.5% and less than five years for 61.5% of the farms surveyed. Most of the cattle owners were males (87%). Over half (61.5%) of farmers had attended some form of training on dairy husbandry or disease control courses within the last three years prior to the start of the study. In addition, 94.5% of farms had an access to extension agents contact more than four times in a year. This possibly explains the value tied up in dairy cattle at household level.

Cowsheds with roofs (90.5%) and concrete floors (51%) were distinct on many farms, and peri-urban located farms had a significantly higher number of concrete-constructed floors compared to urban and rural located farms (P < 0.0048).

Over two thirds (78.5%) of animal feeds came from farm established fodder units or as post harvested crop residues. Most of the respondents (95%) fed their animals on maize bran and a combination of other locally available and compounded protein rich concentrates as shown in Table 3. In the area of study, availability of some concentrates is seasonal due to various weather related factors like rains and drought (Msangi 1998). Restricted suckling (71%) and bucket feeding (29%) were the commonest form of pre-weaning calf rearing system practised. Many farmers feel that mastitis can be reduced by practising restricted suckling. The mean weaning age was 130 days (range 0 - 360 days).

Disease management practices at farm level

Detailed disease preventive measures at farm level are summarised in Table 4