Brazil nut cake, a by-product of small scale oil extraction, is of potential use as a dry season feed supplement for cattle in North Eastern Bolivia. A survey indicated that over 800 tonnes/year of shelled Brazil nuts are used for oil extraction and cake production in Riberalta. Oil extraction plants were also surveyed and samples taken for the analysis of chemical composition, in vitro digestibility and aflatoxin contamination. The nut cakes varied in composition depending on the quality of the nut used and oil extraction process. Cakes had high residual oil contents (100 to 318 g/kg DM) and high protein contents (238 to 442 g/kg DM). Crude fibre contents ranged from 25 to 108 g/kg DM, the higher contents being related to the addition of rice hull in the extraction process. The cakes were highly digestible (69.6 to 94.4%), the lower digestibilities being related to rice hull inclusion. Brazil nut cakes were found to be rich sources of protein, phosphorus and sulphur amino acids. Brazil nut cakes produced from rotten nuts (black cakes) had relatively high levels of aflatoxins and could constitute a hazard to milk consumers if fed to dairy cattle.
The Bolivian Amazon, the
northern and northeastern regions influenced by the Amazon hydrographic basin, is about
one third (360 000 km2) of the total area of Bolivia. This vast region has
diverse physiographic units with different ecosystems, ranging from tropical rainforest to
poorly drained savannas (Pereira and Salinas 1982; Cochrane et al 1985).
The Brazil nut tree (Bertholletia excelsa) grows mainly in the
rainforest of the Amazon regions of Brazil, Bolivia and Peru, but can also be found in Colombia, Venezuela and the
Guyanas, and is one of the largest and most important economic plants of the extractive
reserves in the Amazon (Mori 1992).
The Brazil nuts, classified
as one of the major edible nuts marketed commercially (Rosengarten 1984), are obtained
from woody and thick-walled pods (pyxidium), each of which contains 18-30 seeds with a
woody and bone-hard shell. These are mainly collected for export, as a high value edible
nut used in the confectionery and baking trades, principally in north-western Amazon, the
Acre State of Brazil and the Pando/Beni regions of Bolivia. In northern and northeastern
Bolivia, the extraction, collection and processing of Brazil nuts for export, together
with the latex of Hevea brasiliensis are the
most important sources of income. Brazil nuts are highly nutritious, containing
approximately 14-16 % protein, 65-70 % digestible fat or oil (for this reason it is
considered as a minor oil crop), and 11 % carbohydrates in addition to calcium,
phosphorus, potassium, vitamin B and the rare vitamin excelsine. The oil is rich in
unsaturated fatty acids. The nut is also rich in the sulphur amino acids methionine and
cysteine (FAO 1995). Surplus or damaged nuts are used for processing into Brazil nut oil,
usually extracted in hand presses. The oil is used for cooking, soap-making and lighting.
The residue of oil extraction, cake, can be used for animal feed. The pods are often
utilised as a fuel source or are used to make cups and other household utensils (FAO 1992; Clay and
Clement 1993).
The natural grasslands of
the poorly drained savannas of the Bolivian Amazon region, known as Pampas" or
"Llanos de Moxos (100,000 km2), have been used for sedentary cattle
ranching since colonial times, and form the main basis for the regions animal
production (Rouse 1972). Due to the seasonal rainfall pattern they are flooded for several
months, while droughts of varying severity and duration occur during the dry season
leading to seasonal changes in quality and quantity of forage. The pasture management is
usually limited to sparse grazing of large fenced paddocks and periodic burning by
ranchers (Beck 1984). Natural grasses are the major if not the only feed resource.
Seasonal live weight gains and losses in the dry season, similar to those reported
elsewhere (Golding 1985), along with a low reproductive efficiency are observed in grazing
cattle.
It is well known that in
warm climates, both the quantity and quality of forage available in dry season pastures
are diminished to levels that require supplemental feeding of grazing ruminants with
energy and/or protein, to enable animals to survive, and to produce and reproduce. There
are many factors (eg: input costs, selling prices of products,
possibility of conserving excess forage during the wet season, availability of
supplemental feeds) that influence both the decision of whether or not to supplement
ruminants during the dry season, and what types and amount of supplements to feed (Siebert
and Hunter 1982; Golding 1985). One of the potential feed supplements, locally available,
is Brazil nut cake, which is currently used for feeding dairy cattle. However, there is no
basic information on its chemical composition and digestibility. Moreover, presence of
aflatoxins in the cake might be expected as Brazil nut is highly susceptible to moulds
(FAO 1992). It provides a rich medium for the growth of toxigenic Aspergillus species, especially in humid and warm
tropical regions, as reported for other oilseeds and their meal or cake (Buckle and
Scudamore 1990; Pier 1992; Devegowda et al 1998). The aflatoxins have been of intense
interest to scientists because of their deleterious effects on animal health, and acute
toxicological effects in humans (Wood 1992).
This paper reports the
results of a survey on the kind of nut and oil extraction techniques used to obtain the
Brazil nut cake in north-eastern Bolivia, and how these influence the chemical
composition, in vitro dry matter digestibility
and aflatoxin content.
Before taking
any cake samples, a survey was carried out using a questionnaire to determine the possible
factors which might influence the chemical composition, digestibility and aflatoxin
content of the cakes readily available in the region, and to define how many and which
samples should be taken. It was designed to identify and classify the factories according
to activities such as nut processing for export, oil extraction and cake production, and
to determine the kinds of nuts and processes used for oil extraction, the kind of cake
obtained and its further management. The survey was conducted in April, 1997.
Based on the
results of the survey, cake samples were taken according to the procedure described by
Mallman (1995), taking into consideration the difficulties of taking representative
samples because of the growth characteristics of mould, which is well recognised as the
main source of error for quantitative estimation of mycotoxins concentration (Wood 1992).
The cake samples were stored in air-tight aluminium bags and placed in a refrigerator
until they were sent to the Laboratories of the Natural Resources Institute (NRI) of the
University of Greenwich, England, for further analysis.
Samples were analysed for dry
matter (DM), crude protein (CP), crude fibre (CF), ash (CA), ether extract (EE), total
phosphorus and calcium by methods described in Anonymous (1982).
Amino acids were analysed by separation using ion exchange chromatography on a Biotronik LC5001 amino acid analyser and detection photometrically by ninhydrin (Moore 1963; Moore and Stein 1963).
The in vitro dry
matter digestibility (IVDMD) was determined using the method of Tilley and Terry (1963).
For aflatoxin analysis, all samples were ground using a coffee grinder and the 50 g
analytical samples were taken using a small scoop x10 from throughout the mixed samples.
Samples were analysed by the standard procedure for aflatoxin analysis, SOP3 (Bradburn
etal 1990) with triplicate quantification by HPTLC using a scanning fluorodensitometer
(Scanner II, CAMAG) controlled by software (CATS 3, CAMAG).
Data obtained from the survey are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. Table 1 shows the approximate amount of in-shell raw nut reported by each of the 14 nut shelling factories which responded, of the 15 found in Riberalta City, northeastern Bolivia. An approximate total amount of 21,729 tonnes of in-shell raw nut was processed to obtain 7,171 tonnes of edible nut suitable for export. The processing period is variable among factories, ranging form 2 to 12 months/year. The amounts of rejected nuts (edible of low grade for export = 441 tonnes; rotten = 392 tonnes) from the selection and classification process reported by some 12 of the 15 factories are also shown.
A summary of the use of rejected nuts for oil extraction is
given in Table 2. In the region there are 3 oil extraction plants (A, B, C) that acquired
the rejected nut from nut shelling factories. The rejected nuts used for oil extraction
are classified as: broken or out of size still edible, but not suitable for export; and
rotten. The edible broken, the edible out of size and rotten nuts are used by all plants.
Hand presses are used for oil extraction. To facilitate the oil extraction some plants add
rice hull to the nut in different and variable proportions (Nut : rice hull ratio for A
2:1; for B 8 : 1), but at plant C or, for certain oils at plant B, no rice hull is added.
Two kinds of oils are normally extracted: edible oil and oil for other uses (energy
sources, making soap, etc.). In all plants the edible oil is usually extracted from edible
nuts, but conversely, the oil for other uses is extracted from rotten nuts only in plants
that buy them (A and B). Three kinds of cake are obtained: white, black and mixed. The
white cake results from the extraction of edible oil using edible nuts, and the black cake
is obtained from the extraction of oil for other uses using only rotten nuts. The mixed
cake, produced in plant B, refers to that obtained for mixing both, white and black cakes,
after separately extracting the oil.
Table 1. Approximate production (metric
tonnes) of in-shell nut and the kinds of kernel obtained during processing and grading for
export in different factories |
|||||||||||
Production |
In-shell |
|
Shelled nuts (kernel) |
||||||||
|
|
|
period |
|
raw nut |
|
Processed |
Rejected |
|||
| Factories |
(month) |
|
|
|
for export |
Low grade* |
Rotten |
||||
|
I |
|
12 |
|
3939 |
|
1300 |
|
8 |
|
8 |
|
II |
|
12 |
|
3636 |
|
1200 |
|
20 |
|
20 |
|
III |
|
7 |
|
3500 |
|
1155 |
|
37.8 |
|
9.5 |
|
IV |
|
12 |
|
2909 |
|
960 |
|
145 |
|
145 |
|
V |
|
9 |
|
1919 |
|
633 |
|
28.8 |
|
67.2 |
|
VI |
|
7 |
|
1636 |
|
540 |
|
25 |
|
45 |
|
VII |
|
8 |
|
1018 |
|
336 |
|
NR |
|
NR |
|
VIII |
6 |
|
945 |
|
312 |
|
47.3 |
|
47.3 |
|
|
IX |
|
8 |
|
606 |
|
200 |
|
NR |
|
NR |
|
X |
|
12 |
|
545 |
|
180 |
|
120 |
|
36.1 |
|
XI |
|
3 |
|
350 |
|
115 |
|
2.4 |
|
2.4 |
|
XII |
|
4 |
|
348 |
|
114 |
|
0.6 |
|
6 |
|
XIII |
4 |
|
288 |
|
95 |
|
3 |
|
2 |
|
|
XIV |
2 |
|
90 |
|
29.6 |
|
2.8 |
|
3.1 |
|
|
XV |
12 |
|
NR |
|
NR |
|
NR |
|
NR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N+ |
|
|
|
14 |
|
14 |
|
12 |
|
12 |
|
Total |
|
|
21729 |
|
7170 |
|
441 |
|
392 |
|
|
Mean |
|
|
1552 |
|
512 |
|
36.8 |
|
32.7 |
|
|
Standard
deviation |
|
1336 |
|
441 |
|
45.6 |
|
39.8 |
||
| NR = not
reported |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
* Rejected edible broken and out-of-size
nut. |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
+ Number of factories which reported
some data. |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Table 2. The kinds of nuts and
process used, and the kind of oil and cake obtained during the oil extraction process in
three processing plants (A, B, C) |
|||
|
Processing
plants |
||
Kind of nuts |
|
||
Rejected edible broken |
2 (A, C) |
||
Rejected edible out of size (small) |
All |
||
Rotten |
2 (A, B) |
||
Oil extraction process |
|
||
Pressed without rice hulls |
2 |
||
Pressed with rice hull |
2 (A= 2:1; B= 8:1)+ |
||
Kind of extracted oil |
|
||
Edible oil |
All |
||
Other uses |
2 (A, B) |
||
Kind and amount of cake |
|
|
|
White |
2 (A=240; C=36 tonnes/year)# |
||
Black |
1 |
||
Mixed |
1 (B=2400 tonnes/year) |
||
* Number of processing plants. |
|||
Details of the samples taken in the 3 plants (2 for plant A, 3 for B and 1 for C), after taking into account the results of the survey, are given in Table 3. They have been characterized according to the kind of nut and oil extraction process used, and the kind of cake obtained.
Three white cakes, obtained from rejected edible nuts, were found. One of the white
cakes was obtained using rice hull (sample 1 belonging to the plant A), and the other two
do not (samples 3 and 6 of plants B and C, respectively). The two black cakes (samples 2
and 4), obtained from only rotten nuts as was shown above, and had rice hull in different
proportions according to the plant (2:1 for plant A, and 8:1 for B). The mixed cake (5) of
the plant B, is that obtained from mixing the different kinds of cake after oil
extraction, which are thereafter piled up outside of the plant and marketed in this
way.
Table 3:
Details of the samples |
||||||
|
Samples |
|||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Processing
plants |
A |
A |
B |
B |
B |
C |
Quality of nut |
2* |
3 |
1,2 |
3 |
1,2,3 |
1,2 |
Oil extraction
process |
P+Rh 2:1)# |
P+Rh (2:1) |
P-Rh |
P+Rh (8:1) |
Mixed |
P-Rh |
Kind of cake |
white |
black |
white |
black |
mixed |
white |
# Kind of
nut : 1= Rejected edible broken, 2=Rejected edible out-of-size, 3=Rotten.
|
||||||
Table 4 shows the chemical composition and IVDMD for each sample and the average of all samples.The mean CP content was 376 g/kg DM, ranging from 238 to 442 g/kg DM. The CP content among samples was negatively correlated (r = -0.83, P<0.05) to the EE (residual oil) content. The mean EE content was high, 216 g/kg DM, and variable among samples (range of 100 to 381 g/kg DM). The lowest and highest EE values, both corresponded to the white and black cakes, respectively, of the plant A. The EE content of the three samples of plant B (samples 3, 4 and 5) tended to be more uniform (range of 181 to 187 g/kg DM). The mean CF content was 64 g/kg DM (range of 25 to 108 g/kg DM). Samples with higher values were 1 and 2, 108 and 91 g/kg DM, respectively, of plant A, which uses a nut : rice hull ratio of 2 : 1 during nut pressing, for both (white and black) cake. Among samples of plant B, sample (4) obtained using rice hulls tended to have a higher CF content. Since rice hull was used in plant B, but in less proportion than that in plant A, sample 4 shows a lower CF content (70 g/kg DM) than samples 1 and 2, 108 and 91 g/kg DM, respectively. Sample 3 of plant B and sample 6 of plant C, obtained without adding rice hulls, show a lower CF content, 36 and 25 g/kg DM, respectively. The mean content of ash, Ca and total P were 92, 3.7 and 17.3 g/kg DM, and it was also variable among samples, as was observed in other chemical constituents.
In general, the mean IVDMD of the samples was high (86.3 %). Samples 1 and 2 of plant
A, in spite of the fact that these are different kinds of cake (white and black), obtained
by pressing nut with a high proportion of rice hull, show comparatively lower IVDMD
values, 77.6 and 69.9 %, respectively. The IVDMD of the 3 different samples (3, 4 and 5)
of plant B and sample 6 of plant C was up to 90 %. Although sample 4 was obtained with the
addition of rice hulls, but in a less proportion (nut : rice hull=8:1) to samples 1 and 2
of plant A, it tends to show a high IVDMD
(92.3 %), which is almost similar to that of samples obtained without adding rice hulls,
sample 3 of plant B (94.4 %) and 6 of plant C (92.4 %). Among samples obtained with rice
hulls, the IVDMD was higher in sample 4 than that of the two samples (1 and 2) of plant A (92.3 % vs. 77.6 and 69.9 %).
Table 4. Chemical composition
(g/kg dry matter) and in vitro DM digestibility |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samples |
|
|
|
|
|
All samples |
|||||
|
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
|
Mean |
|
SD* |
|
Dry matter ( % ) |
|
||||||||||||||||